[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6.12-rc2 in_atomic() picks up preempt_disable()
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:17:37 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 20:10 +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
>> 2.6.12-rc2, with CONFIG_PREEMPT and CONFIG_PREEMPT_DEBUG. The
>> in_atomic() macro thinks that preempt_disable() indicates an atomic
>> region so calls to __might_sleep() result in a stack trace.
>but you're not allowed to schedule when preempt is disabled!

That sounds draconian. Where is that requirement stated?

A preempt-disabled region ought to have the same semantics
as in a CONFIG_PREEMPT=n kernel, and since schedule is Ok
in the latter case it should be Ok in the former too.

All that preempt_disable() should do is prevent involuntary
schedules. But the conditional schedules introduced by may-sleep
functions are _voluntary_, so there's no reason to forbid them.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-07 20:44    [W:0.030 / U:3.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site