lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 1/5] sched: remove degenerate domains
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Siddha, Suresh B <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Similarly I am working on adding a new core domain for dual-core
>>systems! All these domains are unnecessary and cause performance
>>isssues on non Multi-threading/Multi-core capable cpus! Agreed that
>>performance impact will be minor but still...
>
>
> ok, lets keep it then. It may in fact simplify the domain setup code: we
> could generate the 'most generic' layout for a given arch all the time,
> and then optimize it automatically. I.e. in theory we could have just a
> single domain-setup routine, which would e.g. generate the NUMA domains
> on SMP too, which would then be optimized away.
>

Yep, exactly. Even so, Andrew: please ignore this patch series
and I'll redo it for you when we all agree on everything.

Thanks.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-06 13:31    [W:0.044 / U:6.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site