[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [08/08] uml: va_copy fix
    On Wednesday 06 April 2005 14:04, Renate Meijer wrote:
    > On Apr 6, 2005, at 1:32 PM, Jörn Engel wrote:
    > > On Tue, 5 April 2005 22:18:26 +0200, Renate Meijer wrote:

    > >
    > > You did read include/linux/compiler.h, didn't you?

    > So instead of applying this patch, simply
    > #define va_copy __va_copy
    > #endif
    > in include/linux/compiler_gcc2.h
    > Thus solving the problem without having to invade compiler namespace all
    > over the place, but doing so in *one* place only.
    About this one: thanks for suggesting this and being constructive, I'll do
    ASAP (if I don't forget) this for the -bk tree. However, I think that Greg KH
    for the stable tree would prefer a local tested patch rather than a global
    one with possible side effects, right Greg?

    Also, I hope this discussion does not count as a vote for the -stable tree
    inclusion (since dropping GCC 2 support in the -stable tree is exactly the
    purpose of this tree, right ;-) ? ).
    Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
    Linux registered user n. 292729

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-04-06 21:15    [W:0.020 / U:1.956 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site