Messages in this thread | | | From | Blaisorblade <> | Subject | Re: [08/08] uml: va_copy fix | Date | Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:13:59 +0200 |
| |
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 14:04, Renate Meijer wrote: > On Apr 6, 2005, at 1:32 PM, Jörn Engel wrote: > > On Tue, 5 April 2005 22:18:26 +0200, Renate Meijer wrote:
> > > > You did read include/linux/compiler.h, didn't you?
> So instead of applying this patch, simply > > #ifdef VERSION_MINOR < WHATEVER > #define va_copy __va_copy > #endif > > in include/linux/compiler_gcc2.h > > Thus solving the problem without having to invade compiler namespace all > over the place, but doing so in *one* place only. About this one: thanks for suggesting this and being constructive, I'll do ASAP (if I don't forget) this for the -bk tree. However, I think that Greg KH for the stable tree would prefer a local tested patch rather than a global one with possible side effects, right Greg?
Also, I hope this discussion does not count as a vote for the -stable tree inclusion (since dropping GCC 2 support in the -stable tree is exactly the purpose of this tree, right ;-) ? ). -- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |