[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [08/08] uml: va_copy fix
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 14:04, Renate Meijer wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2005, at 1:32 PM, Jörn Engel wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 April 2005 22:18:26 +0200, Renate Meijer wrote:

> >
> > You did read include/linux/compiler.h, didn't you?

> So instead of applying this patch, simply
> #define va_copy __va_copy
> #endif
> in include/linux/compiler_gcc2.h
> Thus solving the problem without having to invade compiler namespace all
> over the place, but doing so in *one* place only.
About this one: thanks for suggesting this and being constructive, I'll do
ASAP (if I don't forget) this for the -bk tree. However, I think that Greg KH
for the stable tree would prefer a local tested patch rather than a global
one with possible side effects, right Greg?

Also, I hope this discussion does not count as a vote for the -stable tree
inclusion (since dropping GCC 2 support in the -stable tree is exactly the
purpose of this tree, right ;-) ? ).
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-06 21:15    [W:0.056 / U:0.760 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site