[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 03:55:55PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>>On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:51:30AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>>>>Then let's see some acts. We (lkml) are not the ones with the percieved
>>>>problem, or the ones discussing it.
>>>Actually, there are some legitimate problems with some of the files in
>>>the Linux source base. Last time this came up, the Acenic firmware was
>>>Seems to me that situation is still not resolved.
>>And it looks like no one cares enough to make the effort to resolve this...
>>I would love an open source acenic firmware.
> Yep, but in the meantime, let's clearly mark said firmware as
> not-covered-by-the-GPL. In the acenic case it seems to be even easier, as the
> firmware is in a separate acenic_firmware.h file, and it just needs to have
> the proper licencing statement added, saying that it is not covered by the
> GPL, and then giving the information under what licence it is being
> distributed.

Who has meaningfully contacted Alteon (probably "Neterion" now) about
this? What is the progress of that request?

> Jeff, since your name was found in the tg3.c case, and you seem to care about
> this too, what is your take on this proposal ?
> Friendly,

Bluntly, Debian is being a pain in the ass ;-)

There will always be non-free firmware to deal with, for key hardware.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-06 13:31    [W:0.103 / U:7.324 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site