[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] private mounts
    Miklos Szeredi wrote:
    > > Actually, in terms of complexity, it's not much different from using
    > > bind mounts.
    > As has been suggested by Pavel, bind mounting foreign namespaces could
    > just be done with a new bind_fd(fd, path) syscall and file descriptor
    > passing with SCM_RIGHTS.

    Yes, he's right.

    But you don't need a new system call to bind an fd.

    "mount --bind /proc/self/fd/N mount_point" works, try it.

    > That sounds to me orders of magnitude less complex (on the kernel side
    > at least) than sb sharing.

    In terms of what happens in the kernel, they're almost exactly the
    same: either way, a super block ends up shared by two mounts. That's
    what I meant.

    I agree that in terms of what userspace has to do, if just binding
    works that's simpler. And it does seem to work with the above mount

    -- Jamie
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-04-30 18:51    [W:0.019 / U:2.240 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site