[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: setitimer timer expires too early
Nish Aravamudan wrote:

> Perhaps not discussed before, but definitely a known issue. Check out
> sys_nanosleep(), which adds an extra jiffy to the delay if there is
> going to be one. My patch, which uses human-time (or at least more so
> than currently), should not have issues like this.

What would be then the most precise and reliable delaying possibility in
the present kernel?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-30 17:37    [W:0.048 / U:6.584 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site