Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 30 Apr 2005 17:32:46 +0200 | From | Olivier Croquette <> | Subject | Re: setitimer timer expires too early |
| |
Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> Perhaps not discussed before, but definitely a known issue. Check out > sys_nanosleep(), which adds an extra jiffy to the delay if there is > going to be one. My patch, which uses human-time (or at least more so > than currently), should not have issues like this.
What would be then the most precise and reliable delaying possibility in the present kernel?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |