[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] VFS bugfix: two read_inode() calles without clear_inode() call between
> Why do you need to move it from prune_icache() to dispose_list()?
> For the hash list it's the right thing, but for sb_list it's not
> needed, is it?
Yes, it is not needed but harmless. I did it only because i_hash &
i_sb_list insertions/deletions always come in couple. So I decided move
them both, to be more consistent, to make code less complicated.

If you regard this hazardous I might split these removals. But IMHO, my
variant is a bit more pleasant.

> Retest, and resend.

I assume I don't need to notify Andrew about the inconsistency in the
old patch, or should I?

Best Regards,
Artem B. Bityuckiy,
St.-Petersburg, Russia.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-28 09:40    [W:0.055 / U:0.848 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site