lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRE: [Question] Does the kernel ignore errors writng to disk?
Date
From
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Cox [mailto:alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 9:58 AM
> To: Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org;
> brace@hp.com
> Subject: Re: [Question] Does the kernel ignore errors writng to disk?
>
> On Mer, 2005-04-27 at 19:40, mike.miller@hp.com wrote:
> > It looks like the OS/filesystem (ext2/3 and reiserfs) does
> not wait for for a successful completion. Is this assumption correct?
>
> Of course it doesn't. At 250 ops/second for a decent disk no
> OS waits for completions, all batch and asynchronously queue
> I/O. See man fsync and also O_DIRECT if you need specific "to
> disk" support. If you do that be aware that you must also
> turn write caching off on the IDE disk. I've repeatedly asked
> the "maintainer" of the IDE layer to do this automatically
> but gave up bothering long ago. Without that setting users
> are playing with fire quite honestly.
>
> The alternative with latest 2.6 stuff is to turn on Jens
> Axboe's barrier work which seems to give better performance
> on a drive new enough to have cache flush operations.
>
> Alan
Thanks, Alan. I'll try Jens barrier.

>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-28 17:11    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans