Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 27 Apr 2005 11:01:28 +0300 | From | Pekka Enberg <> | Subject | Re: rootdelay |
| |
Hi David,
On 26 Apr 2005 21:54:35 +0200, David N. Welton <davidw@dedasys.com> wrote: > Oh, I most certainly will polish the code as much as possible should > it prove of interest, but I think what needs vetting is the idea > itself, which I described clearly in english in a subsequent email. > If the idea itself stinks, I'm happy to drop it before spending time > playing around with indentation and other niceties.
But see, that's the problem. You think _other people_ should spend time reviewing your work first so _you_ don't have to waste time. Unfortunately, it looks to me like no one is willing to spend their time reviewing a patch which (a) does not follow Documentation/CodingStyle and (b) is not submitted as per Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
I mean, how much work is it to run you code through scripts/Lindent and drop those awful function banner comments and resend the patch?-)
Pekka - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |