[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
* Thomas Glanzmann:

>> Directory hashing slows down operations that do linear sweeps through
>> the filesystem reading every single file, simply because without
>> dir_index, there is likely to be a correlation between inode order and
>> directory order, whereas with dir_index, readdir() returns entries in
>> hash order.
> thank you for the awareness training. Than mutt should be slower, too.
> Maybe I should repeat that tests.

Benchmarks are actually a bit tricky because as far as I can tell,
once you hash the directories, they are tainted even if you mount your
file system with ext2.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-27 23:00    [W:0.141 / U:0.880 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site