[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
> Hello,
>>Directory hashing slows down operations that do linear sweeps through
>>the filesystem reading every single file, simply because without
>>dir_index, there is likely to be a correlation between inode order and
>>directory order, whereas with dir_index, readdir() returns entries in
>>hash order.
> thank you for the awareness training. Than mutt should be slower, too.
> Maybe I should repeat that tests.

Only if you read every single file in each directory every time. I
thought mutt did header indexing and thus didn't need to do that.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-27 22:42    [W:0.202 / U:2.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site