Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:52:35 +0800 | From | David Teigland <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 7/7] dlm: build |
| |
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:52:15PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 14:25:25 PDT, Andrew Morton said: > > David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > +config DLM > > > Shouldn't it enable SCTP? Depend on NET? > > Looks like it. As a related question, is the SCTP dependency something > fairly innate to the design, or would layering it over other low-level > transports in the future be a possibility? A first glance makes it look > like only lowcomms.c and maybe midcomms.c would be affected.
Thanks, the suggestions so far have been very good and we're working on them.
Other transports are definately a possibility and something that should be quite simple since it's all encapsulated in lowcomms as you've mentioned.
Dave
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |