Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks | Date | Mon, 25 Apr 2005 21:49:50 -0400 |
| |
On Monday 25 April 2005 20:41, Matt Mackall wrote: > Despite the above, it compares pretty well to git in speed and is > quite a bit better in terms of storage space. By reducing the zlib > compression level, it could probably win across the board.
Hi Matt,
Congratulations on an impressive demo! How about actually checking the compression vs wall clock theory? And I probably don't have to mention psyco...
Regards,
Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |