Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 19 Apr 2005 00:28:08 -0700 | From | Paul Jackson <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains aka Isolated cpusets |
| |
Nick wrote: > That would make sense. I'm not familiar with the workings of cpusets, > but that would require every task to be assigned to one of these > sets (or a subset within it), yes?
That's the rub, as I noted a couple of messages ago, while you were writing this message.
It doesn't require every task to be in one of these or a subset.
Tasks could be in some multiple-domain superset, unless that is so painful that we have to add mechanisms to cpusets to prohibit it.
-- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@engr.sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |