lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Re: more git updates..


On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Russell King wrote:
>
> And my entire 2.6.12-rc2 BK tree, unchecked out, is about 220MB, which
> is more dense than CVS.
>
> BK is also a lot better than CVS. So _your_ point is?

Hey, anybody who wants to argue that BK is getter than GIT won't be
getting any counter-arguments from me.

The fact is, I have constraints. Like needing something to work within a
few days. If somebody comes up with a ultra-fast, replicatable, space
efficient SCM in three days, I'm all over it.

In the meantime, I'd suggest people who worry about network bandwidth try
to work out a synchronization protocol that allows you to send "diff
updates" between git repositories. The git model doesn't preclude looking
at the objects and sending diffs instead (and re-creating the objects on
the other side). But my time-constraints _do_.

Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.202 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site