[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Kernel SCM saga..
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 11:24:07AM +0200, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Apr 2005 12:17:58 -0400, David Roundy wrote:
> > I've recently made some improvements recently which will reduce the
> > memory use
> Does this include check for redundancy? ;)

Yeah, the only catch is that if the redundancy checks fail, we now may
leave the repository in an inconsistent, but repairable, state. (Only a
cache of the pristine tree is affected.) The recent improvements mostly
came by increasing the laziness of a few operations, which meant we don't
need to store the entire parsed tree (or parsed patch) in memory for
certain operations.
David Roundy
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-10 15:59    [W:0.110 / U:2.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site