[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Kernel SCM saga..
    On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 02:29:24PM -0400, Daniel Phillips wrote:
    > On Thursday 07 April 2005 14:13, Dmitry Yusupov wrote:
    > > On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 13:54 -0400, Daniel Phillips wrote:
    > > > Three years ago, there was no fully working open source distributed scm
    > > > code base to use as a starting point, so extending BK would have been the
    > > > only easy alternative. But since then the situation has changed. There
    > > > are now several working code bases to provide a good starting point:
    > > > Monotone, Arch, SVK, Bazaar-ng and others.
    > >
    > > Right. For example, SVK is pretty mature project and very close to 1.0
    > > release now. And it supports all kind of merges including Cherry-Picking
    > > Mergeback:
    > >
    > >
    > So for an interim way to get the patch flow back online, SVK is ready to try
    > _now_, and we only need a way to import the version graph? (true/false)

    Well, I followed some of the instructions to mirror the kernel tree on, and although it took around 12 hours to import
    28232 versions, I seem to have a mirror of it on my own subversion
    server now. I think the mirror was taken from bkcvs... the
    last log message I see is "Rev 28232 - torvalds - 2005-04-04 09:08:33"

    I have no idea what's missing. What is everyone's favorite web frontend
    to subversion? I've got websvn (debian package) on there now, and it's a
    bit sluggish, but it seems to work.

    I hope to have time this week or next to actually make this machine
    publicly accessible.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-04-11 00:38    [W:0.019 / U:4.140 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site