lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] del_timer_sync scalability patch
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:

> If we're prepared to rule that a timer handler is not allowed to do
> add_timer_on() then a recurring timer is permanently pinned to a CPU, isn't
> it?

The process may be rescheduled to run on different processor. Then the
add_timer() function (called from schedule_next_timer in
kernel/posix-timers.c) will also add the timer to the new processor
because it is called from the signal handling code. So I think that it
is possible that a periodic timer will be scheduled on different
processors.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:11    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans