lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux 2.6.11.1
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 02:53:43AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 04:28:02PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:36:14PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > But we end up with a cset in the permanent kernel history which simply
> > > > should not have been there.
> > >
> > > Is this really a big deal?
> >
> > Once? No. If it ends up being "par for the course", it's bad.
>
> The amount of stuff in the sucker tree shouldn't really amount
> to /that/ many patches should it ? If it does, then 2.6.x is in
> worse shape than we've all been admitting.
>
> Would it be that much work to just send the 'meat' as gnu patches,
> and leave the not-for-linus stuff alone ?

No it would not be, and should be the way this works.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans