lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Linux 2.6.11.1
    On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 02:53:43AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
    > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 04:28:02PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Greg KH wrote:
    > > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:36:14PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > > > > But we end up with a cset in the permanent kernel history which simply
    > > > > should not have been there.
    > > >
    > > > Is this really a big deal?
    > >
    > > Once? No. If it ends up being "par for the course", it's bad.
    >
    > The amount of stuff in the sucker tree shouldn't really amount
    > to /that/ many patches should it ? If it does, then 2.6.x is in
    > worse shape than we've all been admitting.
    >
    > Would it be that much work to just send the 'meat' as gnu patches,
    > and leave the not-for-linus stuff alone ?

    No it would not be, and should be the way this works.

    thanks,

    greg k-h
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.020 / U:29.548 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site