Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 5 Mar 2005 13:17:28 -0800 (PST) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.6.11.1 |
| |
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005, Russell King wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:40:59AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > I love BK, but what BK does well is merging and maintaining trees full of > > good stuff. What BK sucks at is experimental stuff where you don't know > > whether something should be eventually used or not. > > Wait a minute - why would stuff going into 2.6.x.y be "experimental" > stuff? Wasn't stability the whole point of this tree?
The point being that _before_ a patch gets accepted, it's in that "limbo" state, waiting for people to veto it or say "yes".
That limbo state is not well done with BK.
Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |