Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:08:17 -0800 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.6.11.1 |
| |
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:54:02PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:15:37PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Here's the list of things which we might choose to put into 2.6.11.2. I was > > > > > planning on sending them in for 2.6.12 when that was going to be > > > > > errata-only. > > > > > > > > Ok, care to forward them on? > > > > > > Sure. How do they get to Linus? > > > > Hm, either he pulls them from our new 2.6.x.y tree, or they go to him > > through you. Either way, I'd recommend sending them to him for now, > > We can do that. As long as the patches remain unaltered I assume that BK > will recognise that the patch is already there, in a different cset?
Yes, it can handle such a merge just fine.
> > until we get this whole "procedure" worked out. > > Yup. That's why I'm running this little experiment. Applying stimuli and > seeing how we respond. Yum, cheese.
/me scampers off into the corner... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |