Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 4 Mar 2005 10:52:47 +0000 | From | Russell King <> | Subject | Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering |
| |
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 08:38:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Grump. Have all these regressions received the appropriate level of > visibility on this mailing list?
Looking at the http://l4x.org/k/ site, it appears that all -mm versions have broken ARM support with the defconfig, while Linus kernels at least build fine. I've no idea why though.
I haven't had any reports of breakage, and I don't think I've missed any heads up on something which needs to be fixed up, except maybe the 4 level page table stuff. (TBH I don't think many ARM people look at -mm, but it is worrying that something which may be merged into Linus' tree from -mm may have the unexpected consequence of breaking something which used to work.)
Unfortunately, http://l4x.org/k/ doesn't save any build logs for investigation.
-- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |