[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 1/2] fork_connector: add a fork connector
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 20:25 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Paul Jackson <> wrote:
> >
> > So I suppose if fork_connector were not used to collect <parent pid,
> > child pid> information for accounting, then someone would have to make
> > the case that there were enough other uses, of sufficient value, to add
> > fork_connector. We have to be a bit careful, in the kernel, to avoid
> > adding mechanisms until we have the immediate use in hand. If we don't
> > do this, then the kernel ends up looking like the Gargoyles on a
> > Renaissance church - burdened with overly ornate features serving no
> > earthly purpose.
> I agree completely. In fact the whole drivers/connector directory
> looks pretty suspect. Are there any in-kernel users of it at all?

SuperIO subsystem.
In agenda sit w1, acrypto [but it already looks like it will not be
included :) ].

Evgeniy Polyakov

Crash is better than data corruption -- Arthur Grabowski
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-06 13:31    [W:0.048 / U:3.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site