[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Not a GCC bug (was Re: Big GCC bug!!! [Was: Re: Do not misuse Coverity please])
On Mar 30, 2005, at 20:12, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Why should this be in the kernel makefiles? If my_struct is NULL,
> then the kernel will never reach the if statement.

Well, I think there is probably some arch code that uses 16-bit
that might use a null pointer, or at least a struct that starts
at the 0 address, which would have problems. I think it would
be better to avoid that issue just in case, especially since
this optimization does not save anything in the case of properly
written code.

> A warning might be nice though.

If we could turn off the optimization and add a warning, I
would support that. Even if we could only add the warning, then
at least people would know.

Kyle Moffett

Version: 3.12
GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++: a18 C++++>$ UB/L/X/*++++(+)>$ P+++(++++)>$
L++++(+++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w--- O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+
PGP+++ t+(+++) 5 X R? tv-(--) b++++(++) DI+ D+ G e->++++$ h!*()>++$ r

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-06 13:31    [W:0.046 / U:15.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site