[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: RFD: Kernel release numbering
On Iau, 2005-03-03 at 03:10, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The point is that it's happening anyway. See Andres' -as tree which
> is the basis for the Debian vendor kernel. Getting that up to an
> official status as 2.6.x.y would be very nice (and having it on

IMHO it is nowhere near conservative enough (or at times complete
enough) to be a 2.6.x.y kernel. In some respects -ac is closer but it
also isn't as conservative as a real 2.6.x.y should be.

2.6.x.y needs several people to keep it tight and to ensure there is
always cover on a security fix.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean