[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: RFD: Kernel release numbering
    On Iau, 2005-03-03 at 03:10, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > The point is that it's happening anyway. See Andres' -as tree which
    > is the basis for the Debian vendor kernel. Getting that up to an
    > official status as 2.6.x.y would be very nice (and having it on

    IMHO it is nowhere near conservative enough (or at times complete
    enough) to be a 2.6.x.y kernel. In some respects -ac is closer but it
    also isn't as conservative as a real 2.6.x.y should be.

    2.6.x.y needs several people to keep it tight and to ensure there is
    always cover on a security fix.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.020 / U:18.672 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site