lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: RFD: Kernel release numbering
    From
    Date
    On Iau, 2005-03-03 at 03:10, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > The point is that it's happening anyway. See Andres' -as tree which
    > is the basis for the Debian vendor kernel. Getting that up to an
    > official status as 2.6.x.y would be very nice (and having it on
    > linux.bkbits.net)

    IMHO it is nowhere near conservative enough (or at times complete
    enough) to be a 2.6.x.y kernel. In some respects -ac is closer but it
    also isn't as conservative as a real 2.6.x.y should be.

    2.6.x.y needs several people to keep it tight and to ensure there is
    always cover on a security fix.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.034 / U:0.128 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site