[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: RFD: Kernel release numbering
    On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 14:52 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > I disagree it's unsolvable:
    > 1) At some point in the -rc cycle, you put your foot down and say
    > "nothing but bugfixes."

    Release candidates are supposed to be bugfix only from -rc1. Everything
    else can only be called the "ridiculous count".

    > That's all the 2.4.x's -pre/-rc accomplishes. It encourages people to
    > test, by telling them when their testing would be most useful.

    Correct, but again 2.4 is a different beast as no active development is
    taking place.

    In a active development you should move the -rc step out of the
    development line into a seperate release line after the -preX steps.

    It has two advantages:

    1. The release process is encapsulated and secure against non bugfix
    merges. This can be "sold" to users for testing.

    2. The development cycle is more continous. While -rc1 is led to release
    2.6.X the preparations for 2.6.X+1-pre1 are moving on. This might
    shorten the overall release cycles as well.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.019 / U:170.588 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site