[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] s390: claw network device driver
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Jeff Garzik <> wrote:
>> > Was cc'ed to linux-net last Thursday, but it looks like the messages was
>> > too large and the vger server munched it.
>> This also brings up a larger question... why was a completely unreviewed
>> net driver merged?
> Because nobody noticed that it didn't make it to the mailing list,
> obviously.

That's ducking the question. Let me rephrase.

Why was a complete lack of response judged to be an ACK?

For new drivers, that's a -horrible- precedent. You are quite skilled
at poking random hackers :) why not poke somebody to ack a new drivers?
It's not like this driver (or many of the other new drivers)
desperately need to get into the kernel ASAP, so desperate that a lack
of review was OK.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-06 13:31    [W:0.044 / U:0.412 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site