Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:33:31 +0900 (JST) | Subject | Re: Off-by-one bug at unix_mkname ? | From | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <> |
| |
In article <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503281124450.18443@yvahk01.tjqt.qr> (at Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:25:39 +0200 (MEST)), Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> says:
> > On Mar 28 2005 17:39, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote: > > >+ * This may look like an off by one error but it is > >+ * a bit more subtle. 108 is the longest valid AF_UNIX > >+ * path for a binding. sun_path[108] doesnt as such > >+ * exist. However in kernel space we are guaranteed that > >+ * it is a valid memory location in our kernel > >+ * address buffer. > >+ */ > > Now, does 2.6. _still_ guarantee that 108 is a valid offset?
Yes, it does.
--yoshfuji - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |