Messages in this thread |  | | From | "Chen, Kenneth W" <> | Subject | RE: [patch] optimization: defer bio_vec deallocation | Date | Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:07:30 -0800 |
| |
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 06:38:23PM -0800, Chen, Kenneth W wrote: > We have measured that the following patch give measurable performance gain > for industry standard db benchmark. Comments?
Dave Jones wrote on Monday, March 28, 2005 7:00 PM > If you can't publish results from that certain benchmark due its stupid > restrictions, could you also try running an alternative benchmark that > you can show results from ? > > These nebulous claims of 'measurable gains' could mean anything. > I'm assuming you see a substantial increase in throughput, but > how much is it worth in exchange for complicating the code?
Are you asking for micro-benchmark result? I had a tough time last time around when I presented micro-benchmark result on LKML. I got kicked in the butt for lack of evidence with performance data running real bench on real hardware.
I guess either way, I'm bruised one way or the other.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |