lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Date
Subject[PATCH 2.6.11] aoe [9/12]: add note about the need for deadlock-free sk_buff allocation

add note about the need for deadlock-free sk_buff allocation

Signed-off-by: Ed L. Cashin <ecashin@coraid.com>

diff -uprN a/Documentation/aoe/todo.txt b/Documentation/aoe/todo.txt
--- a/Documentation/aoe/todo.txt 1969-12-31 19:00:00.000000000 -0500
+++ b/Documentation/aoe/todo.txt 2005-03-10 12:19:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+There is a potential for deadlock when allocating a struct sk_buff for
+data that needs to be written out to aoe storage. If the data is
+being written from a dirty page in order to free that page, and if
+there are no other pages available, then deadlock may occur when a
+free page is needed for the sk_buff allocation. This situation has
+not been observed, but it would be nice to eliminate any potential for
+deadlock under memory pressure.
+
+Because ATA over Ethernet is not fragmented by the kernel's IP code,
+the destructore member of the struct sk_buff is available to the aoe
+driver. By using a mempool for allocating all but the first few
+sk_buffs, and by registering a destructor, we should be able to
+efficiently allocate sk_buffs without introducing any potential for
+deadlock.

--
Ed L. Cashin <ecashin@coraid.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-06 13:30    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans