[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Promise SX8 performance issues and CARM_MAX_Q
Bernard Blackham wrote:
> Hi,
> Playing with a recently acquired Promise SX8 card, we've found
> similar performance results to Matt's post to lkml a few months back
> at
> It appears that the driver is only submitting one command at a time
> per port, which is at least one cause of the slowdowns. By raising
> CARM_MAX_Q from 1 to 3 in drivers/block/sx8.c (it was 3 in an
> earlier pre-merge incarnation of carmel.c), we're getting very
> notable speed improvements, with no side effects just yet.
> Knowing very little about what this change has actually done, I've a
> few questions:
> - Should this be considered dangerous?
> - Why was it taken from 3 to 1?
> - Is CARM_MAX_Q a number defined (or limited) by the hardware?

In multi-port stress tests, we couldn't get SX8 to function reliably
without locking up or corrupting data, with more than one outstanding

Maybe a new firmware has solved this by now.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-06 13:30    [W:0.053 / U:1.376 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site