[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-07

    * Ingo Molnar <> wrote:

    > the 'migrate read count' solution seems more promising, as it would
    > keep other parts of the RCU code unchanged. [ But it seems to break
    > the nice 'flip pointers' method you found to force a grace period. If
    > a 'read section' can migrate from one CPU to another then it can
    > migrate back as well, at which point it cannot have the 'old' pointer.
    > Maybe it would still work better than no flip pointers. ]

    the flip pointer method could be made to work if we had a NR_CPUS array
    of 'current RCU pointer' values attached to the task - and that array
    would be cleared if the task exits the read section. But this has memory
    usage worries with large NR_CPUS. (full clearing of the array can be
    avoided by using some sort of 'read section generation' counter attached
    to each pointer)

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-04-06 13:30    [W:0.019 / U:6.024 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site