lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH][alpha] "pm_power_off" [drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_poweroff.ko] undefined!
    Pawe__ Sikora <pluto@pld-linux.org> wrote:
    >
    > Fix for modpost warning:
    > "pm_power_off" [drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_poweroff.ko] undefined!
    >
    > --- linux-2.6.11.3/arch/alpha/kernel/alpha_ksyms.c.orig 2005-03-13 07:44:05.000000000 +0100
    > +++ linux-2.6.11.3/arch/alpha/kernel/alpha_ksyms.c 2005-03-15 23:20:00.405832368 +0100
    > @@ -67,6 +67,9 @@
    > EXPORT_SYMBOL(alpha_using_srm);
    > #endif /* CONFIG_ALPHA_GENERIC */
    >
    > +#include <linux/pm.h>
    > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pm_power_off);
    > +
    > /* platform dependent support */
    > EXPORT_SYMBOL(strcat);
    > EXPORT_SYMBOL(strcmp);
    > --- linux-2.6.11.3/arch/alpha/kernel/process.c.orig 2005-03-13 07:44:40.000000000 +0100
    > +++ linux-2.6.11.3/arch/alpha/kernel/process.c 2005-03-15 23:28:15.687538104 +0100
    > @@ -183,6 +183,8 @@
    >
    > EXPORT_SYMBOL(machine_power_off);
    >
    > +void (*pm_power_off)(void) = machine_power_off;
    > +
    > /* Used by sysrq-p, among others. I don't believe r9-r15 are ever
    > saved in the context it's used. */

    There doesn't seem to be a lot of point in defining it and not using it.

    Perhaps IPMI is making untoward assumptions about the architecture's power
    management? Should we instead be disabling CONFIG_IPMI_POWEROFF on alpha
    (and others?)

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-04-06 13:30    [W:3.073 / U:0.740 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site