[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc4-mm1] connector: Add a fork connector
Guillaume wrote:
> I also run the lmbench and results are send in response to another
> thread "A common layer for Accounting packages". When fork connector is
> turned off the overhead is negligible.


If I read this code right:
> +static inline void fork_connector(pid_t parent, pid_t child)
> +{
> + static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cn_fork_lock);
> + static __u32 seq; /* used to test if message is lost */
> +
> + if (cn_fork_enable) {

then the code executed if the fork connector is off is a call to an
inline function that tests an integer, finds it zero, and returns.

This is sufficiently little code that I for one would hardly
even need lmbench to be comfortable that fork() wasn't impacted
seriously, in the case that the fork connector is disabled.

I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.136 / U:2.304 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site