[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: RFD: Kernel release numbering
    On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 23:46:22 -0500
    Jeff Garzik <> wrote:

    > If Linus/DaveM really don't like -pre/-rc naming, I think 2.6.x.y is
    > preferable to even/odd.

    All of these arguments are circular. If people think that even/odd
    will devalue odd releases, guess what 2.6.x.y will do? By that line
    of reasoning nobody will test 2.6.x just the same as they aren't
    testing 2.6.x-rc* right now.

    I think they will test the odd releases, because as a real release
    they will get slashdot/ announcements.

    That's one of the major things the -rc's don't get. Maybe it gets
    a reference in's weekly kernel article, but mostly kernel
    geeks read those and that's not who we want testing -rc's (such
    geeks already are doing so).

    It has to be a "real" release. That does have an impact. However,
    I am ambivalent about how to make them real. Even/odd, 2.6.x.y,
    either is fine with me.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.020 / U:8.076 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site