Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 02 Mar 2005 16:26:25 -0800 | From | Todd Poynor <> | Subject | Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Custom power states for non-ACPI systems |
| |
Pavel Machek wrote: ... > ...but adding new /sys/power/state might be okay. We should not have > introduced "standby" in the first place [but I guess it is not worth > removing now]. If something has more than 2 states (does user really > want to enter different states in different usage?), I guess we can > add something like "deepmem" or whatever. Is there something with more > than 3 states?
In most of the cases I'm thinking of, it wouldn't be a user requesting a state but rather software (say, a cell phone progressively entering lower power states due to inactivity). I haven't noticed a platform with more than 3 low-power modes so far, but I'm sure it'll happen soon. If the time isn't right for incompatible changes to these interfaces then I guess mapping standby and mem to platform-specific things will work for now, maybe with some tweak to allow a choice of actual state entered. At some more opportune time in the future I'll suggest an attribute that allows a choice of platform-specific method of suspend-to-mem, somewhat like the "disk" attribute for suspend-to-disk. Thanks,
-- Todd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |