[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux 2.6.11

On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Matthias Andree wrote:
> doesn't seem to carry a crypto
> signature for the patch, patch-2.6.11.gz.sign

It's there now (along with the ChangeLog).

The signatures are automatically generated at the master site, and the
mirroring out to the public sites is a separate event, so sometimes (if
you check early) you may miss the signatures for a while until the next
time the scripts run.

The same is true of the .bz2 files, btw (I only upload the .gz ones, the
rest is generated). And obviously the incremental patches.

(In contrast the full ChangeLog was missing because the generation script
I use is not exactly the smart way, so it's O(slow(n)), where slow is n**3
or worse, so the log from the last -rc release is fast, but going back all
the way to 2.6.10 took long long enough that I didn't wait for it).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.078 / U:2.796 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site