Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/6] sparsemem: more separation between NUMA and DISCONTIG | From | Dave Hansen <> | Date | Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:16:17 -0800 |
| |
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 15:08 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > There is some confusion with the SPARSEMEM patch between what > > is needed for DISCONTIG vs. NUMA. For instance, the NODE_DATA() > > macro needs to be switched on NUMA, but not on FLATMEM. > > > > This patch is required if the previous patch is applied. > > This patch breaks !CONFIG_NUMA ppc64: > > include/linux/mmzone.h:387:1: warning: "NODE_DATA" redefined > include/asm/mmzone.h:55:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition > > I'll hack around it for now.
I'll make sure to have it fixed properly in my copy.
Could I have a copy of your .config? I'm keeping a growing collection.
-- Dave
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |