[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] del_timer_sync: proof of concept

    * Oleg Nesterov <> wrote:

    > New rules:
    > ->_base & 1 : is timer pending
    > ->_base & ~1 : timer's base

    how would it look like if we had a separate timer->pending field after
    all? Would it be faster/cleaner?

    (we dont need to keep them small _that_ bad - if there's a good reason
    we should rather add a clean new field than to encode two fields into
    one field and complicate the code.)

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:11    [W:0.019 / U:8.224 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site