[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Locking changes to the driver-model core
    On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:10:11 -0500 (EST), linux-os
    <> wrote:
    > Thought experiment:
    > Suppose you had a kernel-thread whos duty it was to handle the
    > shutdown and restarting of devices on such busses. Since it
    > is the only thing that would touch such code, wouldn't things
    > be a lot simpler and not subject to deadlocks?

    You'd still have to mind devices that were added/removed from
    probe/remove handlers while walking lists.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:11    [W:0.028 / U:22.412 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site