[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Locking changes to the driver-model core
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:10:11 -0500 (EST), linux-os
<> wrote:
> Thought experiment:
> Suppose you had a kernel-thread whos duty it was to handle the
> shutdown and restarting of devices on such busses. Since it
> is the only thing that would touch such code, wouldn't things
> be a lot simpler and not subject to deadlocks?

You'd still have to mind devices that were added/removed from
probe/remove handlers while walking lists.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:11    [W:0.060 / U:10.580 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site