lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01
    From
    Date
    On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 13:05 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
    > Damn! The answer was right there in front of my eyes! Here's the cleanest
    > solution. I forgot about wait_on_bit_lock. I've converted all the locks
    > to use this instead. We probably need to get priority inheritence working
    > on this too someday, but for now it's better than wasting memory or
    > getting into deadlocks.
    >

    I am still not clear on why this did not hit with earlier kernels +
    PREEMPT_DESKTOP. Were the bitlocks introduced recently? Or was another
    lock-break patch dropped?

    Lee

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:11    [W:0.020 / U:34.200 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site