lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Fix irq_affinity write from /proc for IPF
    Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> wrote:
    >
    > > Is it not possible for ia64's ->set_affinity() handler to do this deferring?
    > >
    >
    > There are other places where we re-program, and its fine to call the
    > current version of set_affinity directly, like when we are doing cpu offline
    > and trying to force migrate irqs for ia64.
    >
    > Changing the default set_affinity() for ia64 would result in many changes,
    > this still keeps the same purpose of those access functions, and
    > differentiates the proc write cases alone without changing the meaning
    > of those handler functions. (and a smaller patch)
    >
    > this would further complicate the force migrate irq's when we consider
    > MSI interrupts as well. Since it would have its own set_affinity, and we need
    > to hack into MSI's set affinity handler as well which would complicate things.

    OK, just checking.

    I'll include this change in the next batch, probably post-2.6.12-rc1, thanks.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:11    [W:0.021 / U:31.840 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site