Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:10:10 -0500 | From | Jon Smirl <> | Subject | Re: binary drivers and development |
| |
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:24:15 -0500, John Richard Moser <nigelenki@comcast.net> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I've done more thought, here's a small list of advantages on using > binary drivers, specifically considering UDI. You can consider a > different implementation for binary drivers as well, with most of the > same advantages.
Think about the impact the evolution of devfs and sysfs have on the driver model. They are still evolving. Or the 32 to 64 bit impact on ioctl's.
-- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |