lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] Re: A common layer for Accounting packages
    Hello,

    > I tested without user space listeners and the cost is negligible. I will
    > test with a user space listeners and see the results. I'm going to run
    > the test this week after improving the mechanism that switch on/off the
    > sending of the message.

    I'm also trying to mesure the process-creation/destruction performance on following three environment.
    Archtechture: i686 / Distribution: Fedora Core 3
    * Kernel Preemption is DISABLE
    * SMP kernel but UP-machine / Not Hyper Threading
    [1] 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 normal
    [2] 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 with PAGG based Process Accounting Module
    [3] 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 with fork-connector notification (it's enabled)

    When 367th-fork() was called after fork-connector notification, kernel was locked up.
    (User-Space-Listener has been also run until 366th-fork() notification was received)

    Does this number have any sort of means ?
    In my second trial, kernel was also locked up after 366th-fork() notification.
    Currently, I don't know its causition. Is there a person encounted it?

    # I wanted to say "[2] is faster than [3]" when process-grouping is enable, but the plan came off. :(

    Thanks.
    --
    Linux Promotion Center, NEC
    KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.034 / U:2.048 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site