lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] New operation for kref to help avoid locks
Arjan van de Ven wrote:

>>Just doing an atomic operation is not faster than doing a lock, an
>>atomic operation, then an unlock? Am I missing something?
>>
>>
>
>if the lock and the atomic are on the same cacheline they're the same
>cost on most modern cpus...
>
>
Ah, I see. Not likely to ever be the case with this. The lock will
likely be with the main data structure (the list, or whatever) and the
refcount will be in the individual item in the main data structure (list
entry).

-Corey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.065 / U:0.892 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site