[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Linux Kernel Subversion Howto
    On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Larry McVoy wrote:

    > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 05:06:02AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
    > > So you've somehow managed to trick most kernel developers into
    > > granting you power over not only the BK history
    > It's exactly the same as a file system. If you put some files into a
    > file system does the file system creator owe you the knowledge of how
    > those files are maintained in the file system?

    No, this is not a good analogy at all.

    If I don't want to use a certain filesystem, I mount it and copy the
    files over to another filesystem. What users are interested in are the
    files themselves of course, and the efficiency with which the filesystem
    handles those files. BK is the efficient filesystem here, but anyone
    should be able to freely copy files over to another filesystem without
    any need for the filesystem internals knowledge. If the target
    filesystem is 8.3 without lowercase support then so be it and people
    will need to use a separate file to hold the extra details that cannot
    berepresented natively in the target filesystem. But absolutely 0% of
    the information is lost.

    Again, the BK value is in the efficiency and reliability it has to
    handle a tree like the Linux kernel, not in the Linux kernel tree. It's
    not necessary for you to give away that value in order to provide the
    simple information needed to reconstruct the Linux tree structure as
    people are asking.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.021 / U:5.240 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site