Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 7 Feb 2005 23:36:09 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: Sabotaged PaXtest (was: Re: Patch 4/6 randomize the stack pointer) |
| |
btw., do you consider PaX as a 100% sure solution against 'code injection' attacks (meaning that the attacker wants to execute an arbitrary piece of code, and assuming the attacked application has a stack overflow)? I.e. does PaX avoid all such attacks in a guaranteed way?
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |