lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1
From
Date
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 12:30 -0500, Robert Love wrote:
> Well, I don't share the hatred for ioctl, at least compared to another
> type unsafe interface like write().
>
> But John and I are open to doing whatever is the consensus. If there is
> an agreed alternative, and that is the requirement for merging, I'll do
> it.

Yes, if ioctl is unacceptable, then providing a write() interface is
what we will do.

>
> I'd like to keep the user-space interface and simple, and absolutely
> want to keep the single file descriptor approach. How the fd is
> obtained is up for discussion.

I would still like to keep the character device as the interface for
getting the fd. I don't see what benefit could be gained by converting
to a syscall based interface for getting the fd.

--
John McCutchan <ttb@tentacle.dhs.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.096 / U:9.100 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site