[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1: softlockup and suspend/resume

    * Rafael J. Wysocki <> wrote:

    > > I've attached a patch for touch_softlockup_watchdog() below - but i think
    > > what we really need is another mechanism. I'm wondering what the primary
    > > reason for the lockup-detection is - did swsuspend stop the the softlockup
    > > threads?
    > If my understanding is correct, the time between suspend (ie the
    > creation of the image) and resume (ie the resotration of the image) is
    > considered as spent in the kernel, so it triggers softlockup as soon
    > as its threads are woken up (is that correct, Pavel?).

    ah, ok. Could you try my patch and add touch_softlockup_watchdog() to
    the resume code (before interrupts are re-enabled)?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.020 / U:7.392 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site