Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 5 Feb 2005 20:47:22 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1: softlockup and suspend/resume |
| |
Hi!
> > It looks like softlockup is not happy with suspend/resume: > > Does it happen while writing out state to disk? I've attached a patch > for touch_softlockup_watchdog() below - but i think what we really need > is another mechanism. I'm wondering what the primary reason for the > lockup-detection is - did swsuspend stop the the softlockup threads?
swsusp likes all threads stopped. You can mark threads PF_NOFREEZE and swsusp will leave them alone. Pavel
-- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |